Na našu objavu od 23.09. nakon nastupa uživo u HRT4 emisiji na temu „EU Chat Control“ https://vijesti.hrt.hr/eu/trebamo-li-brinuti-zbog-masovnog-nadzora-online-komunikacije--12347764 jasno uočavamo da ova tema nailazi na sve značajniji interes šire, ne samo stručne, javnosti, a što je po nama moralo biti osigurano kroz transparentnost od samog početka procesa donošenja novog EU regulatornog okvira.
Pri tom javnost nije dovoljno upoznata sa stajalištem EDPB-a (European Data Protection Board) kao krovnog tijela za zaštitu podataka na razini EU u čijem sastavu se nalaze predstavnici svih nadzornih tijela članica EU i kojem je potpredsjednik ravnatelj AZOP-a Zdravko Vukić.
Stoga vrijedi javnosti dati do znanja u kojoj mjeri su s aspekta zaštite osobnih podataka neprihvatljivi dijelovi „EU Chat Control“ prijedloga:
Citiramo najvažnije dijelove stajališta:
„The European Data Protection Board (‘EDPB’) acknowledges the importance of the fight against child sexual abuse online1. While it welcomes the recent improvements proposed by the European Parliament2 that remedy some of the main issues of the original Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse3 (the ‘Proposal’), the EDPB calls upon the co-legislators to make sure that any new legal instrument is not ambiguous and fully respects the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection.
The EDPB is of the opinion that this wording does not guarantee that detection orders would actually be targeted and addressed only to individuals who are likely to be involved in the dissemination of CSAM.
Criteria on how to decide which persons or groups should be targeted by a detection order are missing. In light of this, the EDPB is concerned that the EP position would still allow for the issuance of detection orders that are general and indiscriminate in nature.
Furthermore, the EDPB regrets that the EP position would still provide for the issuance of detection orders for new CSAM, despite the fact that the error rates of the technologies that may be used for this purpose are significant.
Irrespective of the approach chosen by the Parliament, the EDPB recalls9 that in the context of interpersonal communications, end-to-end encryption is a crucial tool for ensuring the confidentiality of electronic communications, as it provides strong technical safeguards against access to the content of the communications by anyone other than the sender and the recipient(s), including by the provider.
Preventing or discouraging in any way the use of end-to-end encryption, imposing on service providers an obligation to process electronic communication data for purposes other than providing their services, or imposing on them an obligation to proactively forward electronic communications to third parties would entail the risk that providers offer fewer encrypted services in order to better comply with the obligations, thus weakening the role of encryption in general and undermining the respect for fundamental rights and the trust in digital services.“
#gdprcroatia
